Module 05 · The People's Court
The public judges power
No account is required. One vote per device, and you can change it at any time. The verdict is live from the first vote and always shows the count and distribution.
Verdict cmtnmiy350zrugqo3tjz7v72c · person profile
Has och fyra nämndemän, Hovrätten för Västra Sverige abused their power?
The question follows the real target type. AI judges only whether the reason is relevant.
AI checks only relevance — never whether the opinion is right.0
No IP is stored. The device proof is irreversibly hashed. Voting does not require accepting terms.
Live result
0 votes0%
100%
Abused · 0Did not · 0
What both sides say
Awaiting the first voteThose who see abuse of power
No relevant original reasons have been submitted yet.
Those who do not see abuse of power
No relevant original reasons have been submitted yet.
Show every original reason ▾
Originals: sees abuse of power
Originals: does not see abuse of power
Open verdicts
FD-019 · FD-020 · FD-031 · FD-073 · FD-074 · FD-075 · FD-076 · FD-085 · FD-086 · FD-087 · FD-088 · FD-195 · FD-186The public vote is a public verdict. One vote per device, enforced with an irreversibly hashed device proof, changeable at any time but never duplicated. The verdict question is context-specific. A reason is required and the vote counts only after AI approves its relevance; AI never judges the opinion. The default view uses AI to summarise both sides and every original reason can be expanded. Voting does not require accepting the terms.